Logo


Opinions Statutes Gpo Uploaded documents Links Lawyers Questions
Team    

   Search  



AMALGAMATED ASS'N v. SOUTHERN BUS LINE

Jurisdiction: Fifth Circuit
Decision date: no Date

empty empty empty empty empty (6) visits

Citation: 201 F.2d 53 empty empty empty empty empty
Neutral citation: 1953 US App (5th) 24 0 votes
Legal status: Precedential 5 visits
Jurisdiction: Fifth Circuit
Decision date: Wednesday, 14 January 1953
Tags related to the opinion:  no Tags
Citation: list of in going and out going citations to the present case
Citator: list of judicial treatments of the present case

Page 1, 201 F.2d 53, 1

201 F.2d 53

AMALGAMATED ASS'N OF STREET, ELECTRIC RY., AND MOTOR COACH EMPLOYEES OF AMERICA, DIVISION NO. 1127, etc., et al., v. SOUTHERN BUS LINES, Inc. (two cases).

No. 13939.

No. 13940.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

January 14, 1953.

Evelyn Hunt Conner, Bay St. Louis, Miss., L. Barrett Jones, Jackson, Miss., Ben Stevens, Hattiesburg, Miss., for appellants.

Robert C. Cannada, Jackson, Miss., Grove Stafford, Alexandria, La., for appellees.

Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and HOLMES and RIVES, Circuit Judges.

HUTCHESON, Chief Judge.

When these two cases were here before, the appeals were from judgments dismissing the complaints on the merits for failure to state a cause of action.

Of the opinion that they should have been dismissed for want of jurisdiction, this court reversed the judgments and remanded the causes, with specific directions to dismiss them for want of jurisdiction.Footnote 1

This time the appeals are from judgments entered not only in accordance with the law of the state as established on the former appeals, but in execution of, and in precise accord with, our mandates.

In such circumstances, unlike where judgments of reversal are general, appeals from the judgments entered on the mandates present nothing for our review. The appeals are, therefore, dismissed.Footnote 2

Notes:

____________________

[Footnote 1]

1 5 Cir.,  189 F.2d 219, at page 222

[Footnote 2]

2 28 U.S.C.A. § 2106, note 390; Merrill v. National Bank, 5 Cir., 78 F. 208, and cases cited; Singer Mfg. v. Adams, 5 Cir., 185 F. 768; Seagraves v. Wallace, 5 Cir., 69 F.2d 163, at page 164

delicius digg reddit stumbleupon google yahoo technorati slashdot

feedback

invite a friend

         


Provide a new tag:

Rate opinion importance:
Vote: full empty empty empty empty     
full full empty empty empty
full full full empty empty
full full full full empty
full full full full full

 Opinions last viewed:
   201 F.2d 53

 Personal comment:
 
 



© 2008 PreCYdent, Inc. - About PreCYdent - Advertise with us - F.A.Q. - How to cite us

All cases and statutes published on this site are in the Public Domain