Logo


Opinions Statutes Gpo Uploaded documents Links Lawyers Questions
Team    

   Search  



UNITED STATES FIDELITY GUARANTY CO. v. UNITED STATES

Jurisdiction: Tenth Circuit
Decision date: Tuesday, 30 December 1952

empty empty empty empty empty (13) visits

Citation: 209 F.2d 347 empty empty empty empty empty
Neutral citation: 1954 US App (10th) 86 0 votes
Legal status: Opinion 11 visits
Jurisdiction: Tenth Circuit
Decision date: Monday, 11 January 1954
Tags related to the opinion:  no Tags
Citation: list of in going and out going citations to the present case
Citator: list of judicial treatments of the present case

Page 1, , 1

209 F.2d 347

54-1 USTC P 9164

UNITED STATES. v. ZSCHACH CONST. CO. et al.

No. 4714.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

Jan. 11, 1954.

S. Dee Hanson, Washington, D.C. (H. Brian Holland, Asst. Atty. Gen., Ellis N. Slack, A. F. Prescott, and Dudley J. Godfrey, Jr., Spec. Assts. to the Atty. Gen., and Frank D. McSherry, U.S. Atty., Muskogee, Okl., were with him on the brief), for the United States.

Remington Rogers, Tulsa, Okl., and Maurice M. Thomas, Oklahoma City, Okl. (Ned Looney and Clyde J. Watts, Oklahoma City, Okl., were with them on the brief), for appellees.

Before HUXMAN, MURRAH, and PICKETT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal involves withholding and employment tax liability for the years 1948 and 1949.

The question is whether the court erred in failing to hold Pool Construction Company, the Western Casualty and Surety Company, the North American Casualty and Surety Reinsurance Corporation, and the Excess Insurance Company of America secondarily liable for the unpaid taxes of Zschach Construction Company to the extent of the amounts it deducted from its employees and then failed to pay over to the government.

It is conceded that this case is indistinguishable in fact or in law from that of United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. United States, 10 Cir., 1952,  201 F.2d 118. The government, however, contends that our conclusions in that case are erroneous and asks us to reexamine the question and overrule our former decision. Suffice it to say we have given further consideration to the question presented and a majority of the court adheres to the views expressed in our former decision.

The judgment appealed from is, therefore, Affirmed on authority of United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. United States, 10 Cir.,  201 F.2d 118. See, also, General Casualty Co. of America v. United States. 5 Cir., 205 F.2d 753.

____________________

delicius digg reddit stumbleupon google yahoo technorati slashdot

feedback

invite a friend

         


Provide a new tag:

Rate opinion importance:
Vote: full empty empty empty empty     
full full empty empty empty
full full full empty empty
full full full full empty
full full full full full

 Opinions last viewed:
   209 F.2d 347

 Personal comment:
 
 



© 2008 PreCYdent, Inc. - About PreCYdent - Advertise with us - F.A.Q. - How to cite us

All cases and statutes published on this site are in the Public Domain