Logo


Opinions Statutes Gpo Uploaded documents Links Lawyers Questions
Team    

   Search  




Citation: 210 F.2d 29 empty empty empty empty empty
Neutral citation: 1954 US App (DC) 111 0 votes
Legal status: Opinion 15 visits
Jurisdiction: DC Circuit
Decision date: Thursday, 4 February 1954
Tags related to the opinion:  no Tags
Citation: list of in going and out going citations to the present case
Citator: list of judicial treatments of the present case

Page 1, , 1

210 F.2d 29

PARELMAN v. PARELMAN.

No. 11732.

United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.

Argued November 18, 1953.

Decided February 4, 1954.

Mr. J. E. Bindeman, Washington, D. C., for appellant. Mr. Theodore Kligman, Washington, D. C., entered an appearance for appellant.

Mr. Albert E. Brault, Washington, D. C., with whom Mr. Denver H. Graham, Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for appellee.

Before WILBUR K. MILLER, BAZELON and WASHINGTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

In this suit a mother charged her son with negligence which she alleged was the proximate cause of personal injuries sustained by her, for which she sought damages in the sum of $25,000. The mother complains on appeal that the trial judge erred in directing a verdict for the defendant at the close of her counsel's opening statement to the jury.

We think the judge correctly concluded, from what the plaintiff's counsel said he expected to prove, that a cause of action had not been stated.

Affirmed.

____________________

delicius digg reddit stumbleupon google yahoo technorati slashdot

feedback

invite a friend

         


Provide a new tag:

Rate opinion importance:
Vote: full empty empty empty empty     
full full empty empty empty
full full full empty empty
full full full full empty
full full full full full

 Opinions last viewed:
   210 F.2d 29

 Personal comment:
 
 



© 2008 PreCYdent, Inc. - About PreCYdent - Advertise with us - F.A.Q. - How to cite us

All cases and statutes published on this site are in the Public Domain